{"id":421,"date":"2005-03-01T15:13:00","date_gmt":"2005-03-01T20:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/?p=421"},"modified":"2025-03-14T15:14:19","modified_gmt":"2025-03-14T20:14:19","slug":"philosophiques-volume-32-numero-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/2005\/03\/01\/philosophiques-volume-32-numero-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Philosophiques, volume 32, num\u00e9ro 1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Questions d’interpr\u00e9tation<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Dossier<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sous la direction de<\/em> Martin Montminy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lire sur \u00c9rudit<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Table des mati\u00e8res<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Article<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Martin Montminy. Introduction : interpr\u00e9tation et interp\u00e9rationnismes, pp. 3-17.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J\u00e9r\u00f4me Dokic. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation ordinaire, entre simulation et m\u00e9ta-repr\u00e9sentation, pp. 19-37.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J\u00e9r\u00f4me Pelletier. Deux conceptions de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation des r\u00e9cits de fiction, pp. 39-54.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peter McCormick. Litt\u00e9ralement d\u00e9pourvu de sens, pp. 55-82.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

David Davies. Intentions et signification de l\u2019\u00e9nonciation, pp. 83-99.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marie D. Martel. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tationnisme pluraliste et la nature de l\u2019oeuvre litt\u00e9raire, pp. 101-123.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jerrold Levinson. Contextualisme esth\u00e9tique, pp. 125-133.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sherri Irvin. Interpr\u00e9tation et description d\u2019une oeuvre d\u2019art, pp. 135-148.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Isabelle Delpla. Entre l\u2019injustifiable et le superf\u00e9tatoire : les normes rationnelles de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation, pp. 149-168.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Michel Seymour. Interpr\u00e9tationnisme ou institutionnalisme ?, pp. 169-190.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Martin Montminy. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tationnisme radical, pp. 191-206.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disputatio<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

David Davies. Pr\u00e9cis de Art as Performance, pp. 207-214.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roger Pouivet. Le statut de l\u2019oeuvre d\u2019art comme \u00e9v\u00e9nement chez David Davies, pp. 214-220.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jean-Pierre Cometti. L\u2019art en action : de quelques ontologies pr\u00e9caires, pp. 220-224.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paisley Livingston. L\u2019ontologie et la valeur artistique, pp. 224-229.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

David Davies. R\u00e9ponses \u00e0 mes critiques, pp. 229-245.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00c9tude critique<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Christian Nadeau. \u00catre nous-m\u00eames – \u00c9tude critique de : Charles Larmore, Les pratiques du moi, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, collection \u00ab \u00c9thique et philosophie morale \u00bb, 2004, 265 pages., pp. 247-257.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Compte rendu<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

David Pich\u00e9. Alain de Libera, Raison et foi. Arch\u00e9ologie d\u2019une crise d\u2019Albert le Grand \u00e0 Jean-Paul II, Paris, Le Seuil, coll. \u00ab L\u2019ordre philosophique \u00bb, 2003, 512 pages., pp. 259-263.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Laurent Jaffro. S\u00e9bastien Charles, Berkeley au si\u00e8cle des Lumi\u00e8res. Immat\u00e9rialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe si\u00e8cle, Paris, Vrin, coll. \u00ab Biblioth\u00e8que d\u2019histoire de la philosophie \u00bb, 2003, 370 pages., pp. 264-266.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

S\u00e9bastien Gandon. Mathieu Marion, Ludwig Wittgenstein : introduction au \u00ab Tractatus logico-philosophicus \u00bb, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, coll. \u00ab Philosophies \u00bb, 2004, 128 pages., pp. 266-268.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yvon Gauthier. Pierre Cassou-Nogu\u00e8s, G\u00f6del, Les Belles Lettres, coll. \u00ab Figures du savoir \u00bb, 2004, 190 pages., pp. 269-270.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Sinclair. Kirk Ludwig (\u00e9d.), Donald Davidson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 240 pages., pp. 271-273.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fabrice Teroni. Philosophie de l\u2019esprit. Textes r\u00e9unis par D. Fisette et P. Poirier. Volume 1 : Psychologie du sens commun et sciences de l\u2019esprit, Vrin, 2002, 381 pages. Volume 2 : Probl\u00e8mes et perspectives, Vrin, 2003, 380 pages., pp. 274-277.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jean Robillard. C\u00e9line Lafontaine, L\u2019empire cybern\u00e9tique. Des machines \u00e0 penser \u00e0 la pens\u00e9e machine, Paris, Le Seuil, 2004, 238 pages., pp. 277-281.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Tremblay. Alain de Libera, La r\u00e9f\u00e9rence vide. Th\u00e9ories de la proposition, Paris, PUF, coll. \u00ab Chaire \u00c9tienne Gilson \u00bb, 2002, 357 pages., pp. 282-284.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pascal Bouchez. Daniel Jacques, La r\u00e9volution technique : Essai sur le devoir d\u2019humanit\u00e9, Montr\u00e9al, Bor\u00e9al, 2002, 192 pages., pp. 284-286.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alain L\u00e9tourneau. Joseph Yvon Th\u00e9riault, Critique de l\u2019am\u00e9ricanit\u00e9. M\u00e9moire et d\u00e9mocratie au Qu\u00e9bec, Montr\u00e9al, Qu\u00e9bec-Am\u00e9rique, 2002, 376 pages., pp. 286-289.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

s.a.. Livres re\u00e7us (printemps 2005), pp. 291-292.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Questions d’interpr\u00e9tation Dossier Sous la direction de Martin Montminy Lire sur \u00c9rudit Table des mati\u00e8res Article Martin Montminy. Introduction : interpr\u00e9tation et interp\u00e9rationnismes, pp. 3-17. J\u00e9r\u00f4me Dokic. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation ordinaire, entre simulation et m\u00e9ta-repr\u00e9sentation, pp. 19-37. J\u00e9r\u00f4me Pelletier. Deux conceptions de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation des r\u00e9cits de fiction, pp. 39-54. Peter McCormick. Litt\u00e9ralement d\u00e9pourvu de sens, pp. 55-82. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,62],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophiques","category-volume-32"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=421"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":422,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/421\/revisions\/422"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laspq.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}